Singapore Essay example -- Politics, Social Control

deal Singapore be described in terms of a Foucauldian corrective parliamentary law or a Deleuzian control society? Deleuze proposed that we argon in the midst of shift from Foucaults society of discipline to a society of control (1992 3). Unlike the disciplinary society where subjects progress from one shape institution to another (schools, college, factories, offices, etc.), a control society is typified by unceasing modulation (Wise, 2002 32). According to Rose, control operates by affiliating subjects to a variety of practices which by design encourage adherence to certain norms in modern swelled societies (2000 325). This is what Deleuze meant by a society of control. Best believes we need to clear the Deleuzian concept of a control society to explain the societies emerging in the context of the increased surveillance and network capacity permitted by sassy ICTs (2010 9). On the other hand, Hardt and Negri propose this society of control is simply an intensification and generalization of the normalising apparatuses of disciplinarity, that now reaching beyond the institutions that initiated them and into fluctuating networks (2000 23). Likewise, Munro believes Foucaults disciplinary mechanism need updating to bring it in-line with the capacities of modern technologies, not substitute (2000 693).It is necessary to distinguish between unconscious neighborly control and social control in relation to the institution, the latter being the planned solicitude of a socialised human activity (Lianos, 2003 415). Institutional control is intrinsical to the specific activities, is usually bureaucratic, and is part both of the rationale and the outcome of these activities (Lianos, 2003 415). Lianos uses the warning of... ... Google offers free storage space, along with other privileges and useful tools, in exchange for individualised information that it might use to market targeted goods to its users (Andrejevic, 2007 296). People progressted their deta ils to Google and Facebook not out of fear or a sense of duty, but so they may enjoy the benefits offered. Although Singaporeans do value their privacy, they are willing to submit that privacy in exchange for financial rewards or convenience (Hui et al., 2007 27). These authors alike report a growing disgruntlement at the increasing amounts of information that websites are demanding. However, it was the quantity of information requested, rather than the sensitivity of the information that had any portentous influence on compliance (Hui et al., 2007 27). This certainly aligns with the enticement model proposed by Whitaker (1999 141).